Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Supreme Court

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided August 31, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 92-C-1326Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CARRIGAN, District Judge.

Pro se plaintiff Daniel R. Wiley commenced this action contending that Colo. R.Civ.P. 241.24(a) violates his rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. He requests that this court declare Rule 241.-24(a) unconstitutional, enjoin defendants from enforcing that rule, grant him a new state-court trial, and award him his costs and attorneys’ fees. Defendants, the Supreme Court of the State of Colorado, its Chief Justice Luis D. Rovira and Justices Joseph R. Quinn, William H. Erickson, George E. Lohr,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
Van Sickle v. HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
Wayne R. Anderson v. The State of Colorado and the Judges of the First Judicial District, Jefferson County, ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
Charles Ben Howell, and Ken E. MacKey v. The Supreme Court of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
Strauss v. DrewDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.