Legal Opinion

City of South Fulton v. Parker

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

The original bill in this cause was filed by the City of South Fulton against a number of property owners, to enforce an apportionment of a special assessment, representing the cost of paving two of the streets of the city, with concrete and gravel. The property owned by each of the defendants is described and identified in the bill by metes and bounds, together with the amount of the assessment apportioned to each such lot.

The bill avers that the assessments were made pursuant to an ordinance of the city government, enacted by the city under the authority of Private Acts of 1927, chapter…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Mayor of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Dashiell v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  3. Gatling v. . Commissioners of CarteretSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. Mayor of Baltimore v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1824
  5. State ex rel. Bonner v. AndrewsTennessee Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Knoxville v. GervinTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Cook v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  3. Obion County Ex Rel. North Fork Drainage Dist. No. 2 v. MassengillTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Armstrong v. City of South FultonTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. BennettTennessee Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API