Legal Opinion

Bacino v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 17, 1939No. 14,456PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous

Plaintipp in error, defendant below, was convicted of the larceny of a number of diamond rings of the property of the Mahan Jewelry Company of Colorado Springs. Defendant was tried as an accessory made a principal by section 13, chapter 48, ’35 C. S. A., which, so far as pertinent, provides: “An accessory is he or she who stands by and aids, abets or assists, or who, not being present, aiding, abetting or assisting, hath advised and encouraged the perpetration of the crime. He or she who thus aids, abets or assists, advises or encourages, shall be deemed and considered as principal and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Warford v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Connor v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  3. Mulligan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  4. Miller v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  5. Clarke v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. MarquesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  2. People v. IhmeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. Armijo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  4. Perry v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  5. Paine v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API