Legal Opinion

Flores v. Hickman

District Court, C.D. California

Decided January 25, 2008No. CV 06-4299-RSWL(RC)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition and other papers along with the attached Amended Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, as well as petitioner’s objections, and has made a de novo determination.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Amended Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) the Amended Report and Recommendation is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein; and (3)…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boultinghouse v. HallDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
  2. (HC) Moreau v. SpearmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. (HC) Phea v. PfeifferDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. Alberto M. Bernal v. The People of the State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
  5. Alberto M. Bernal v. The People of the State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API