Aircraft Service International, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 117
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1ConcurrenceBerzon, Circuit Judge
I agree with the majority that the district court erred in granting an injunction, as Aircraft Service International Group (“ASIG”) has not complied with its duty under Section 8 of the Norris-LaGuardia Act (“NLGA”) to make “every reasonable effort to settle [its] dispute” with the fuel-ers before seeking an injunction prohibiting the planned work stoppage. 29 U.S.C. § 108. I write only to explain that, in my view, even if ASIG had complied with its duty under Section 8, ASIG still would not have been entitled to an injunction.
The conflict underlying this case is un-disputably a “labor…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Union Pacific R. Co. v. Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen Gen. Comm. of Adjustment, Central RegionSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.