Williams v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Cammack
Affirming.
Appellants, Bye and Sid Williams, were accused §? the crime of maliciously striking and wounding another with intent to kill. Section 1166 of the Statutes. Their punishment was fixed by the jury at confinement in the Reformatory for two years. Prom the judgments on the verdict appellants appeal.
Appellants filed only a part of the transcript of the record of their trial with the Clerk of the Court of Appeals within the 60 day period allowed. No extension of time was requested. Section 336, subsection 4, of the Criminal Code of Practice provides:
“If…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Adkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
- Salisbury v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Wood v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875
- Ledington v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Cline v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hudgeons v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Pinion v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938