Legal Opinion

Kincaid v. Hurst

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 17, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Tilford

— Affirming.

The sole question presented for decision by this appeal is whether an adverse judgment in a proceeding for a re-count of the ballots cast in the August 2, 1941, Primary barred a subsequent contest by appellee in which he was adjudged entitled to the Republican nomination for the office of sheriff of Lee County. Both proceedings were instituted under the provisions of Section 1550-28, Kentucky Statutes, the former on August 6th, and the latter on August 16, 1941. The recount resulted in reducing appellant’s apparent majority from four to three…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Snowden v. FlaneryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Wurts v. NewsomeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Shelton v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Wolff v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  5. Austin v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Widick v. RalstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  2. Brandenberg v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  3. Hogg v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  4. Rives v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1974
  5. Ritchie v. MannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API