Legal Opinion
Maria Bridenbaugh, et al. v. Ford Motor Company
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided September 28, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00188Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 MARIA BRIDENBAUGH, et al., 4 Plaintiffs, Case No.: 2:24-cv-00188-GMN-BNW 5 vs. 6 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 7 PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. 8 9 Pending before the Court is the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 35), 10 filed by Plaintiffs Maria and John Bridenbaugh. Defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) 11 filed a Response, (ECF No. 38), to which Plaintiffs filed a Reply, (ECF No. 41). Further 12 pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Expedite, (ECF No. 45). Ford did not file a 13 Response,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.