Legal Opinion

People v. Price

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 15, 1984No. 83-1792PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McGILLICUDDY

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of retail theft (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 38, pars. 16A—3(a), 16A—10(2)). Subsequently, he was sentenced to a term of three years’ incarceration. On appeal, the issue is whether, in order to obtain the enhanced penalty contained in section 16A—10(2), the State, in presenting its case to the trier of fact, must prove that the alleged offense was a second or subsequent offense of retail theft.

A summary of the evidence presented at trial is as follows: On November 12, 1982, two security officers employed at Carson Pirie Scott & Company, located at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HayesIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. PalmerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. HallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. People v. VaughnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. People v. DaviesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. People v. FlattAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API