Cortelyou, Ege & Vanzandt v. McCarthy
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Holt county. Tried below before Kinkaid, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Ryan, C.
On November 6, 1890, Justin McCarthy, Sr., recovered a judgment against the firm of Cortelyou, Ege & Vanzandt in the district court of Holt county. This judgment was affirmed in the supreme court (Cortelyou v. McCarthy, 37 Neb. 742), and this action was brought upon the supersedeas bond given in the original action. Prom a judgment rendered as prayed the principals and sureties on the bond prosecute error to this court.
It is first urged that the petition failed to state a cause of action against the parties to the bond. The petition recited the pendency of the action, the rendition of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Long v. ClappNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- Dorsey v. McGeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Boldt v. BudwigNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Scott v. ChopeNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Flannagan v. ClevelandNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Standard Distilling & Distributing Co. v. HarrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Brong v. SpenceNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Knight v. DarbyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898