Legal Opinion

Barker v. Findley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 5, 1929No. 18830PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY, C.

This action was begun by J. A. Findley, as plaintiff, against Norman Barker, as defendant, in the district court of Washington county, on four separate promissory notes aggregating the sum of $731.80, principal and interest. The defendant rented law office rooms from plaintiff for a number of years, and the notes were given for past-due rent. Defendant by way of answer admitted executing the notes, but denied that he was indebted to plaintiff by reason of a claim for damages set up in a cross-petition filed with his answer. In his cross-petition he alleged that, during a period…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Horton v. EarlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Hanley v. BanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  3. Tucker v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  4. Enterprise Seed Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Nelson v. EichoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Price v. MacThwaite Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Bradley v. McCabeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Nehring v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Gordon v. ReinheimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Lyman v. CowenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API