Legal Opinion

Hanley v. Banks

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 2, 1897PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from the Probate Cou/rt of Noble County; before A. B. Museller, Probate Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Tarsney, J.:

This case was commenced in the probate court of Noble county to recover a judgment for $150, alleged to be due as rent upon a contract evidenced by a written lease. The lease was by the plaintiffs below to the defendants below of the first story or store-room, and also a room 24x40 feet, upstairs, of a building in the city of Perry, to be used by the defendants for the purposes of carrying on a furniture and undertaking business. There was no stipulations or covenants in the lease that the building was at the time of the leasing in suitable condition for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. . HarteauNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Edwards v. . N.Y. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Krueger v. FerrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. Cheeseborough v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1834
  5. Wilkinson v. ClausonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Horton v. EarlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Schneider v. DeckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. York v. StewardMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Selz v. StaffordIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Brisley v. MahaffeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API