Legal Opinion
State v. Arcia
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 25, 2008No. AC 28433PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendant, Jose Arcia, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-71 (a) (1) and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (2). He alleges evidentiary error and instructional impropriety. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. The defendant met O 2 in 1996, and a romantic relationship ensued. In the fall of 1999,0 and her daughters, E, L, and J, moved into the defendant’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. RomeroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. RitrovatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. KoslikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Madir v. DanielSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2010
- State v. Norman P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- State v. RoseConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. ARCIASupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.