Legal Opinion

State v. Donald

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 2, 2017No. SC19786PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, C.J.

**348 The defendant, Ravon Donald, challenges the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress a signed, sworn statement he made to the police in which he confessed to committing a robbery and assault at a grocery store. The defendant claims that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress his statement because the police initially questioned him concerning his knowledge of the robbery while he was in custody before they provided Miranda warnings 1 and then, after the warnings, proceeded to more thoroughly question him, resulting in the challenged statement. We hold that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Brunetti v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gould v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  2. State v. BrandonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  3. State v. RussawConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  4. Vaccaro v. D'AngeloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Chemtura Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API