Legal Opinion
Wing & Evans v. Hartupee
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 29, 1903No. 35PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
This is a suit in equity brought by a judgment creditor of the Charleroi Plate Glass Company to compel William D. Hartupee and George W. Crouse to account, inter alia, for the value of certain shares of stock of the Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company. Other questions were also raised in the court below, but no other need be considered here. The facts, which are not in dispute, are so clearly stated by the learned circuit judge that we reproduce nearly all his opinion from the report in 112 Fed. 817 et seq.:
“The purpose of the amended bill is to charge the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- Cook v. Berlin Woolen Mill Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Painter v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847
- Silverthorn v. McKinsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
- Wing v. Charleroi Plate Glass Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1902
3Cited by2 opinions
- Putthoff v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923
- Plews v. BurrageDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927