Legal Opinion

Wing v. Charleroi Plate Glass Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1902No. 8PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Sur amended bill, answers, and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

ACHESON, Circuit Judge.

The purpose of the amended bill is to charge the defendants George W. Crouse and William D. Har-tupee personally with the plaintiffs’ judgment against the Charleroi Plate Class Company. The answers are responsive to and in denial of all the averments of the amended bill upon which the plaintiffs’ case rests. The only witnesses examined by the plaintiffs were the two named defendants, and their testimony sustains the answers. The amended bill does not allege that the Charleroi Plate Glass Company was insolvent at the time it sold its plant and other property to the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wing & Evans v. HartupeeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API