Legal Opinion
Arnold Ex Rel. Hill v. Hartford Life Insurance
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided February 21, 2008No. Civil Action 7:07CV00093PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLEN E. CONRAD, District Judge.
This case arises under the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (“ERISA”). The case involves the plaintiffs claim for mandatory and voluntary Accidental Death and Dismemberment (“AD & D”) benefits from the defendant, Hartford Life Insurance Co., pursuant to the Volvo Welfare Benefit Plan, which included such coverage for the employees of Volvo Trucks North America, Inc., the employer of the plaintiffs deceased father, Arlys Arnold. This case is before the court on the parties’ cross…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Mary Jane Wickman v. Northwestern National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Terry's Floor Fashions, Inc. v. Burlington Industries, Inc. Lees Carpets, a Division of Burlington Industries, Inc. And Eatman's Carpets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Bernstein v. CapitalCare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Danouvong v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Frame v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
- Tran v. United of Omaha Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2011
- Grose v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of CanadaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2008