Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Kenyatta Riley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2016No. 2010AP002942-DPublished

1Concurrence 1

¶ 92.

2Concurrence · AbrahamsonShirley S. Abrahamson, J.

I agree that a public reprimand and full costs should be imposed. I do not, however, join the opinion of three justices of this court. The opinion of the three justices is not a majority opinion. It is, in the terminology of the court, a "lead opinion."

¶ 93. The phrase "lead opinion" is not, as far as I am aware, defined in our Internal Operating Procedures or elsewhere in the case law. Our Internal Operating Procedures (IOP) refer to "lead opinions," but only in stating that if, during the process of circulating and revising opinions, "the opinion originally circulated as the majority…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. DoweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. Michael R. GriepWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. Richard Lavon DeadwillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API