Franks v. Sematech, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Does an employee’s intervention in a workers’ compensation carrier’s subrogation action against third parties alleged to have injured the employee relate back to the filing of the subrogation action so as to escape the bar of limitations? The lower courts answered no. 938 S.W.2d 462. We disagree.
While working for Daw Technologies, Inc., Charle Franks was struck by a security gate on the premises of Sematech, Inc. The gate was manufactured by Burle Industries, Inc. Daw’s compensation carrier, Industrial Indemnity Insurance Co., paid Franks benefits. Section 417.001 of the Labor Code provides…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Guillot v. HixTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Yeary v. HinojosaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Franks v. Sematech, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
3Cited by35 opinions
- Antonov v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sonic Systems International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- First Insurance Co. of Hawaii v. a & B Properties, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012
- Prudential Property & Casualty Co. v. Dow Chevrolet-Olds, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
- Mississippi Food & Fuel Workers' Compensation Trust v. TackettCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.