Legal Opinion · Dissent
People v. Schulz
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 16, 1944Published
1Dissent
Rippey and Conway, JJ.,
dissent upon the ground that there is no prohibition, in the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, of the act charged against the defendant and that such prohibition may not he implied. (People v. Wallace & Company, 282 N. Y. 417, 419; People v. Nelson, 153 N. Y. 90, 94; People v. Weinstock 193 N. Y. 481, 485.)
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. . NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- People v. Wallace CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- People v. . WeinstockNew York Court of Appeals · 1908