People v. . Weinstock
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 7, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury upon an agreed statement of facts. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 7, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury upon an agreed statement of facts. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The sale of foreign grouse was not prohibited by section 27 of the Forest, Fish and Game Law; the provisions of that act as to the filing of a bond created a rule of evidence only, and not a prohibition. (Carpenter v. People, 8 Barb.…
1Opinion of the CourtHaight, J.
This action was brought to recover penalties imposed by the Forest, Fish and Game Law of the state of Hew York for violations of its provisions. It appears from the facts agreed upon that the defendant sold in the borough of Manhattan during the open season, on the 16th day of Hovember, 1905, six grouse, and that on the 24th day of Hovember he also sold six grouse. It was further agreed that the grouse so sold were not taken within the state of Hew York nor within twenty-five miles of the state line and that the defendant had not given the bond specified in section 27 of the Forest, Fish and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. WeinstockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. SchulzNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- People v. SchulzNew York Court of Appeals · 1944