Commonwealth v. Runkle
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, President Judge:
Appellant, Sterling George Runkle, takes this appeal from his conviction by a jury of two counts of maintaining gambling devices and of gambling. 1 Appellant raises two challenges to his convictions. First, whether Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board Officers have the authority to conduct a warrantless search of a private club, holding a liquor license, for gambling activities and devices. Second, whether the Commonwealth produced sufficient evidence to establish appellant’s control, knowledge or maintenance of gambling devices upon the premises of the club. We conclude…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. HudakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- In re Catering Club Liquor License No. CC-4837Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- In re Revocation of Club Liquor License No. C-5745Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Lawrence v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.