Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. City of Philadelphia

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1988No. Civ. A. No. 86-4254PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.

Plaintiff James Lawrence alleges a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 as well as pendent state claims for false imprisonment, assault and battery, malicious prosecution, and unlawful search and seizure against the City of Philadelphia and six individual officers. Presently pending before this Court is plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against the six individual officers as to his federal cause of action.

I

Summary judgment is appropriately entered if the moving party demonstrates to the court that no genuine issue exists as to any…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lawrence v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API