Legal Opinion
Boldface Licensing + Branding v. By Lee Tillett, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 11, 2013No. Case No. CV 12-10269 ABC PJWXPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
AUDREY B. COLLINS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant and Counterclaimant By Lee Tillett, Inc.’s (“Tillett’s”) motion for a preliminary injunction, filed on February 11, 2013. (Docket No. 30.) Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Boldface Licensing + Branding (“Boldface”) opposed on February 19 and Tillett replied on February 25. The Court heard oral argument on Monday, March 11, 2013. For the reasons below, the motion is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND1
This case is the second of two trademark lawsuits involving Boldface’s nationwide…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kroma Makeup EU, LLC v. Boldface Licensing + Branding, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Moroccanoil, Inc. v. Marc Anthony Cosmetics, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- San Diego Comic Convention, Non-Profit Corp. v. Dan Farr Prods.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Eyebobs, LLC v. Snap, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Adidas America, Inc. v. Skechers USA, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.