Legal Opinion
Carnation Company, a Corporation v. Pacific Westbound Conference, Far East Conference and the Federal Maritime Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 28, 1964No. 18926_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
On December 5, 1962, the appellant Carnation Company filed in the court below its complaint against Pacific Westbound Conference and Far East Conference, and numerous individual shipping lines, members of those conferences, seeking recovery of treble damages under the antitrust acts1 on account of damages claimed to have been suffered by Carnation through an alleged unlawful combination fixing prices and rates for shipment of Carnation’s manufactured products to the Philippine Islands, pursuant to agreements among them which had not been filed with or approved by the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carnation Co. v. Pacific Westbound ConferenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Joseph Segal, and Western States Telephone Co., Inc., Etc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Mt. Hood Stages, Inc., Doing Business as Pacific Trailways v. The Greyhound Corporation and Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- The Government of Guam v. American President LinesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- State v. New York Movers Tariff Bureau, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.