Malik Muhammad v. J. Rubia
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
California state prisoner Malik Ali Muhammad appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and may affirm on any ground supported by the record, Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare Sys., 534 F.3d 1116, 1121 (9th Cir.2008). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Muhammad’s due process claim because he received…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Herman Resnick v. Warden Hayes Lt. Ernst Officer Myers (Dho) Counselor Aune Officer WadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jerardo Rodriguez v. David Cook, Director, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare System, LPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- (PC) Atencio v. AllisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Bejarano v. LynchDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Brookins v. AcostaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Brownlee v. LynchDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Brownlee v. LynchDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.