Legal Opinion

(PC) Brookins v. Acosta

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 27, 2021No. 1:19-cv-00401Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BARRY L. BROOKINS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00401-HBK 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS NON-COGNIZABLE CLAIMS2 13 v. FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 14 F. ACOSTA, (Doc. No. 12) 15 Defendant.1 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO 16 ASSIGN CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 Plaintiff Barry L. Brookins, proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a civil rights 20 complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is 21 before the Court for screening. (Doc. No. 12).…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API