Muhammad v. Gap Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION HANEEF MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:24-cv-3676 v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE GAP INC., et al., Magistrate Judge Vascura Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Largely due to pro se Plaintiff Haneef Muhammad’s litigation tactics, what started as a relatively straightforward case has become a morass. This case is a year old and is still in the motion-to-dismiss phase. Yet Muhammad has filed no less than thirty-seven motions, twenty-nine of which he recently filed in a span of less than six weeks. Before that filing spree, most…