Legal Opinion

Jackson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 17, 1967No. 181-62PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColliNS, Judge

More than 5y2 years prior to the commencement of this suit plaintiffs were removed from their positions as civilian employees of the Department of the Army. In tiffs action, they allege both procedural and substantive irregularities in their removal proceedings and, upon these grounds, they base their present claims to back pay.

Plaintiffs are all veterans’ preference eligibles, who, at the time of their removals, were in the excepted service, work*31ing for the Department of the Army in Japan. On March 2, 1956, each of the six was tried by a general conrt-martial, convened at Tokyo, Japan.1 The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kinsella v. United States Ex Rel. SingletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. McElroy v. United States Ex Rel. GuagliardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Nicholas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Grisham v. HaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brundage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  2. O'Callahan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  3. Albert H. Grisham v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. Steuer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  5. Cason v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API