Legal Opinion
Mittal Canada, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 10, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-20; Court 05-00689PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Senior Judge.
Before the Court is the motion of Plaintiff Mittal Canada, Inc. (“Plaintiff’) for a preliminary injunction under USCIT R. 65(a) to prevent U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) from liquidating Plaintiffs entries of steel wire rod entered from October 1, 2004 through September 30, 2005 (“the Entries”). On December 30, 2005, the Court granted a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) to enjoin the liquidations pending the disposition of the preliminary injunction motion. Underlying the preliminary injunction request is Plaintiffs claim that the U.S.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Am General Corporation and General Motors Corporation v. Daimlerchrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mittal Canada, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Parkdale International v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Intercontinental Chems., LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.Coal. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- J.D. Irving, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023