Legal Opinion
Monarch Life Insurance v. Loyal Protective Life Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 8, 1963PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVET, District Judge.
The defendant, Loyal Protective Life Insurance Company (Loyal), moves pursuant to Rule 12(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss this action for lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter.
The complaint seeks treble damages from the defendant for the latter’s violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. It alleges that both the plaintiff and the defendant are Massachusetts insurance companies licensed to and doing business in the State of New York; that both are in competition in the sale of accident and health insurance in interstate commerce throughout the United…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Curtis Ambulance of Florida, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Shawnee, Kansas, and Medevac Midamerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Transnational Insurance Company v. RosenlundDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1966
- United States v. Rebecca Ann Smith, United States of America v. Clifford Rickard ArthurCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Rebecca Ann Smith, United States of America v. Clifford Rickard ArthurCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Rebecca Ann Smith, United States of America v. Clifford Rickard ArthurCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982