State v. Lohss
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
September Term, 1973.]
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, C. J.
The threshold question presented by these appeals is whether this Court has jurisdiction to hear them. 1
LAWRENCE H. LOHSS and DONALD M. SPRENKLE were jointly indicted, charged with violations of the controlled dangerous substances law. The indictment was dismissed as to each of them prior to trial on the merits because the State could not prove the charges presented without evidence which was excluded upon grant by the court below of motions to suppress property obtained by a search and seizure found to have been unlawful. The order dismissing the indictment as to Lohss was issued by Evans,…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lohss and Sprenkle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Matter of AndersonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Matter of TraderCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Waugh v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Neal v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.