Waugh v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.
“[F]or the purpose of the Fourth Amendment there is a constitutional difference between houses and cars.” Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U. S. 42, 52, 90 S. Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970). As the ever-growing common law continues to require fresh responses to fresh questions, it poses (for Maryland) the new riddle: “Is a suitcase more like a house or more like a car?” In terms of functional analysis — the weighing of the nature of the sanctuary against the investigative imperative — a suitcase is, we hold, “more like a car.” Before supplying the rationale for the answer, let us set the stage for…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. KazmierczakMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Bouldin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Minnick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Waine v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.