Legal Opinion

Waugh v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 18, 1974No. 571, September Term, 1973PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

“[F]or the purpose of the Fourth Amendment there is a constitutional difference between houses and cars.” Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U. S. 42, 52, 90 S. Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970). As the ever-growing common law continues to require fresh responses to fresh questions, it poses (for Maryland) the new riddle: “Is a suitcase more like a house or more like a car?” In terms of functional analysis — the weighing of the nature of the sanctuary against the investigative imperative — a suitcase is, we hold, “more like a car.” Before supplying the rationale for the answer, let us set the stage for…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. KazmierczakMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Bouldin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Dixon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Minnick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Waine v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API