Legal Opinion
Clinco v. Roberts
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 25, 1999No. CV 98-9263 DDP (CWx)PublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO REMAND
PREGERSON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff Peter Clinco’s motion to remand. 1 The motion is based on Clinco’s filing of a first amended complaint which destroys diversity. The Court does not permit Clinco to so amend the complaint and therefore denies the motion to remand.
I. Background
A. Facts
According to the complaint, plaintiff Clinco is an attorney who represented a client named A.G. Dorsey, professionally known as Engelbert Humperdinck. Dorsey had a partnership with an entity known as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Desert Empire Bank, Etc. v. Insurance Co. Of North America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Donald Newcombe v. Adolf Coors Company Foote, Cone and Belding and Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Newby v. Alto Riviera ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- IBC Aviation Services, Inc. v. Compañia Mexicana De AviacionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
- McGrath v. Home Depot USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Palestini v. General Dynamics Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2000
- Murphy v. American General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Boon v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.