Albert v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
On Petition For Rehearing
Before McINTYRE and McEWAN, JJ., and PEARSON, District Judge. PER CURIAM.
The defendant, Don Willard Albert, has petitioned for rehearing. He asserts, only by a line-by-line reading of the original trial transcript can it be determined whether the state’s evidence was sufficient to prove defendant-Albert guilty of sodomy and murder in the second degree.
We made it clear in our original opinion (Albert v. State, Wyo., 466 P.2d 826) that the proceeding under review was not an appeal from the judgment of conviction. Inasmuch as Albert had been convicted November 30, 1955,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Albert v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
- Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1968
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hoggatt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Munoz v. MaschnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Johnson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Harlow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- McCutcheon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.