Legal Opinion

Vigeant v. Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1945PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.

This is an action to recover a real estate commission. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony, the court indicated that it would give defendant’s instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence; whereupon, plaintiff took a nonsuit and, his motion to set the same aside having been overruled, he has appealed. This is the second appeal in the case. See Vigeant v. Fidelity National Bank & Trust Company, 158 S. W. (2d) 184, where most of the facts are fully stated.

The petition alleges that plaintiff was employed by the defendant to sell a certain tract of land in Kansas City; that finally,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Klotsch v. P. F. Collier & Son Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  2. Wood v. Kansas City Home Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Allen v. ChouteauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Coughlin v. HaeusslerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  5. Parsons v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brewer v. BlantonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Wolfson v. ChelistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Wilcox v. SwensonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. J.A. Tobin Construction Co. v. State Highway Commission of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. DeMott v. DillinghamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API