Legal Opinion

McCullen v. Coakley

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 22, 2012No. Civil Action No. 08-10066-JLTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOSEPH L. TAURO, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This case concerns a recently revised Massachusetts statute, Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 266, § 120E1/2 (“Act”), which establishes a thirty-five-foot fixed buffer zone around driveways and entrances of reproductive health care facilities (“RHCFs”). Presently at issue is Plaintiffs’ challenge to the Act as applied to their speech activities at three RHCFs in Boston, Worcester, and Springfield. For the reasons given below, this court finds that the Act as applied is a valid regulation of the time, place, and manner of Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCullen v. CoakleySupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. McCullen v. CoakleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API