Legal Opinion
Bobby Lee Collins v. Kurgan, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 8, 2025No. 2:23-cv-01600Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BOBBY LEE COLLINS, No. 2:23-cv-1600 CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 KURGAN, ET AL., FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 18 complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants’ fully briefed motion for summary judgment is 19 before the Court. As discussed below, defendants’ motion should be denied. 20 I. PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 21 In his verified first amended complaint, plaintiff alleges…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.