Legal Opinion
Olson v. Continental Resources, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 17, 2004No. 99,704PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
CAROL M. HANSEN, Judge.
¶ 1 PlaintiffAppellant, Robert Olson, seeks review of the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants/Appellees, Continental Resources, Inc. and its officers (collectively Continental), and Davis Operating Company and its president (collectively Davis). We affirm because Olson submitted no evidentiary materials establishing a material issue of fact.
¶2 Olson sued Continental and Davis to quiet title to an overriding royalty interest (ORRI) in an oil and gas lease and to recover damages for “sham legal process” and “civil conspiracy,”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Brock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- La Laguna Ranch Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Probst v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Rees v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The PPW Royalty Trust, etc. v. George BartonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Willits v. PEABODY COAL CO., LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Olson v. Continental Resources, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
- The PPW Royalty Trust, etc. v. George BartonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016