Legal Opinion

Mataya v. Delta Life Ins.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1952No. 19573PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McBRIDE, Judge.

This- suit was brought on a policy of insurance for $500 on the life of plaintiff’s wife, he being the beneficiary. The insured died on October 8, 1949. The company defended the action on the ground that in her written application for the policy of insurance, the insured intentionally deceived the company by concealing information regarding the state of her health and physical condition. The district court dismissed the suit, and plaintiff has appealed.

*566It is of the utmost importance to first determine whether the policy is one of industrial life insurance. On May 30', 1949,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fisette v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Rutherford v. Acacia Mut. Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Dominique v. Washington Nat. Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mataya v. Delta Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  2. Mataya v. Delta Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Kelmell v. Atlas Life InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API