Legal Opinion

Kurt S. Adler, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 20, 1973No. C.D. 4484; Court No. 69/40288Published

1Opinion of the Court

NewmaN, Judge:

Defendant has moved to strike the complaint filed in this action, which is captioned “Paeksmith Coep., Plaintiff v. United States, Defendant”.1.The basis of defendant’s motion is that Parksmith Corp. is not the plaintiff in this action, and hence was not authorized to file the complaint pursuant to rule 4.4. No opposition or other response to the motion has been filed on behalf of either Park-smith Cprp. or Kurt S.: Adler, Inc., importer of record who filed this protest. . . . . , •. The court’s.file reveals that on February 2, 1973-.defendant filed a motion to dismiss the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bendix Mouldings, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  2. Delaware Watch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API