Legal Opinion
Symes v. Harris
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 20, 2006No. 06-1014PublishedCited by 124 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Kim Symes and Christopher Northcott, United Kingdom citizens, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, naming Stephen Harris, Magdalen Harris, and Ro-taloc Int’l LLC (RIL), Colorado citizens, as defendants. The district court dismissed the plaintiffs’ action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to join a necessary party, Rotaloc (Europe) LTD (REL). We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and reverse the district court’s order and remand to the district court with directions to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Radil v. Sanborn Western Camps, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- Dutcher v. MathesonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Halebian v. BervCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Wilderness Society v. Kane CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Vibo Corp. v. State ex rel. McDanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- Thlopthlocco Tribal Town v. StidhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.