Legal Opinion

In re the Unified Court System

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*878OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the charges imposed by the respondent against the experience rating account of the Unified Court System with respect to city marshals should be canceled.

We agree that for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Paul J. Yesawich, Jr., at the Appellate Division (88 AD2d 717, 718), city marshals are independent contractors, not employees. We hold, further, that city marshals are local not State officers (see Public Officers Law, § 2), appointed by the Mayor, not paid by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Unified Court SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fox v. DoranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Grebow v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1990
  4. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports2006
  5. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API