Legal Opinion

Public Employee Claims Division v. Tiner

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 22, 1992No. CA 91-112PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Elizabeth W. Danielson, Judge.

In this workers’ compensation case, appellants contend that the commission’s findings that appellee sustained a compensable injury and that she is temporarily totally disabled are not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm.

At the time of the hearing in this matter, appellee was 63 years old and had been employed by the Newport Public School System for 33 years. It is undisputed that appellee has had a hiatal hernia and gastrointestinal problems for a number of years preceding the date of the injury. On January 6, 1988, appellee was called in to work to cook…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scarbrough v. Cherokee EnterprisesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Nashville Livestock Commission v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Black v. Riverside Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  4. MacK v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Austin v. Highway 15 Water Users Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. SSI, INC. v. CatesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  2. ST. VINCENT INFIRMARY NEDICAL CENTER v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  3. CDI CONTRACTORS v. McHaleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Robinson v. Ed Williams Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Pharmerica v. SerattCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API