Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Simonds

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1960No. 9131PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHLQUIST,. District Judge.

This is an appeal from summary judgment granted in the court below in favor of the defendants and respondents. For the purpose of considering whether or not summary judgment should have been granted, this court accepts all of the plaintiffs’ (the appellants) allegations made below as facts.

All of the land in question was owned by a farmer, Wilford Seequist, who subdivided it. The area now known as Block 2 of Holiday Heights Plat “A” Subdivision in Salt Lake County, had been . farmed for over 35 years-and the irrigation water.had run as shown by the line labeled…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Adamson Et Ux. v. BrockbankUtah Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Salt Lake County v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Watkins v. SimondsUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Ovard v. CannonUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Chournos v. AlkemaUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Salt Lake County v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API