Legal Opinion

Harbers v. Brune

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1922No. 8251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Colorado County; M. Kennon, Judge. Suit by A. J. Harbers and J. A. Pondrom against E. J. Bruñe and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff Pondrom appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDane, J.

This suit was instituted by appellant J. A. Pondrom against appellees, E. J. Bruñe and Carrie Leyendeeker, for specific performance of a purported contract for the sale of land, hereinafter set out.

While the cause is styled “A. J. Harbers et al. v. E. J. Bruñe et al.,” Harbers is not a party plaintiff, but the suit, so far as shown by the record, was a suit by J. A. Pondrom alone, seeking to force appellees, Bruñe and Leyendeeker, to specifically perform the following contract:

“Erelsburg, Texas, 3/18/1919.
“Post Office Rt. 2, New Ulm.
“A. J. Harbers, Columbus, Texas — Dear Sir: I hereby agree…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosen v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Kellner v. RamdohrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Langham v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Pfaff v. CilsdorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Noland v. HaywoodWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Kraus v. CampeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API