Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLC

California Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2012No. S186149Published

1Concurrence

WERDEGAR, J., Concurring.

Can the developer of a condominium project unilaterally impose arbitration on the condominium’s homeowners association by recording a mandatory arbitration clause for construction-related claims at or before the association’s inception? Because the Legislature has elected to permit developers to do so, I agree with the majority that a developer can and that the arbitration clause at issue here is enforceable. Because I think the clause’s validity rests on narrower grounds than those invoked by the majority, I write separately.

I

Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLC…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Citizens for Covenant Compliance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Villa De Las Palmas Homeowners Ass'n v. TerifajCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API