Liverpool London & Globe Insurance v. Hall
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Memorandum. — Error from Republic district court; F. W. Sturges, judge. Action by M. E. and I. B. Hall against the Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, grid defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Garver, J. :
We are met at the threshold of this case by the defendants in error objecting that the record is not in such condition that the court can consider the errors complained of. The first objection is that there is no petition in error which the court can recognize, and that what purports to be an amended *19petition in error cannot cure defects in the first petition, because it was filed in the supreme court more than one year after the entering of the judgment sought to be reversed. The amendment to the original petition in error, being as to a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Reed v. Washington Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Hall v. Norwalk Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
- German-American Insurance v. EthertonNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Taylor v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Davis v. Atlas Assurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- American Ins. Co. of Newark, N.J. v. RodenhouseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Long Island Insurance v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896