Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Reome

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 2009Published

1Dissent

Hurlbutt, J.P., and Martoche, J.

(dissenting). We respectfully dissent. Pursuant to CPL 60.22 (1), “[a] defendant may not be convicted of any offense upon the testimony of an accomplice unsupported by corroborative evidence tending to connect the defendant with the commission of such offense.” As noted in People v Delgado (50 AD3d 915, 917 [2008], quoting People v Steinberg, 79 NY2d 673, 683 [1992]), “ ‘[t]he corroboration must be independent of, and may not draw its weight and probative value from, the accomplice’s testimony.’ ” Further, “[although the corroborative evidence need not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. GlasperNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. ReddyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API