Legal Opinion

Compagnie De Navigation Francaise v. Burley

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 3, 1910No. 604PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit by Compagnie de Navigation I'ramjaisc, as owner of tlie French bark Amiral Cecille, against Thomas S. Burley and Robert McCullough, doing business under the firm name of the Tacoma Tug & Barge Company.

1Opinion of the Court

DONWORTH, District Judge.

On the evening of November 9,’ 1904, during a heavy fog the French bark Amiral Cecille, lying at anchor in Tacoma Harbor was struck by the steamer Multnomah which had just left her berth at Tacoma bound for Seattle on one of her regular trips. The Multnomah suffered damage- but the bark was uninjured. On a libel filed in this court by the owner of the Multnomah against the bark, Judge Hanford decided both vessels to be at fault, the Multnomah in failing to steer with proper care and in failing in other respects to exercise the vigilance demanded by the existing…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Belden v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Atlee v. Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1875

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The Framlington CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  2. Barbey Packing Corporation v. the SS StavrosDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1959
  3. Essex County Electric Company v. Motor Ship GodafossDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955
  4. Royal Ins. v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  5. The VeraDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API